← Back to Dashboard

Transaction Compliance Nexus

Agentic AI for Real-Time Transaction Compliance

Technical Whitepaper v2.0 | January 2026

1 System Overview

The Transaction Compliance Nexus (TCN) is a pre-clearing compliance layer that intercepts every transaction before it reaches the clearing house. Unlike advisory fraud tools that run in parallel, TCN is an inline gate that autonomously decides: ACCEPT, REVIEW, or BLOCK—in under 50 milliseconds.

1Transaction
Ingestion
280D Vector
Generation
3Multi-Agent
Inference
4Audit Risk
Calculation
5Decision
& Explanation

Core Innovation: Interpretable Vector Space

Each transaction is encoded into an 80-dimensional semantic vector where every dimension has explicit meaning. This enables:

🔍 Explainability

Every decision can point to specific risk factors (e.g., "mule_account_indicator: 0.89")

📐 Geometric Reasoning

Cosine similarity measures deviation from "ideal" behavior in vector space

🧠 Agentic AI Ready

Structured vectors enable AI agents to perceive, reason, and learn autonomously

✓ Regulatory Advantage

Unlike black-box neural networks with 1000+ opaque dimensions, TCN's 80 named dimensions satisfy EU AI Act, SR 11-7, and GDPR Art. 22 explainability requirements.

2 The 80-Dimensional Risk Vector Space

Each transaction generates two 40-dimensional vectors. Values range from 0.0 (low risk) to 1.0 (high risk). Together, they form an 80D combined vector that captures complete transaction context.

Risk Matrix = IRT × CR → 40 × 40 = 1,600 risk variable combinations
The outer product creates a full correlation matrix, though inference uses the 80D vector directly

2.1 Inherent Risk (IR) — Entity Profile (40 Dimensions)

IR captures who is transacting: account history, behavioral patterns, and risk classification.

CategoryDimensionsKey IndicatorsPerfect Values
Account Profile IR[0-9] account_age_days, kyc_completeness_score, biometric_match_score 0.01–0.05
Transaction History IR[10-19] historical_chargeback_ratio, payment_consistency_score 0.01–0.15
Behavioral Profile IR[20-29] device_consistency_score, ip_consistency_score, session_behavior_score 0.03–0.10
Risk Classification IR[30-39] pep_status_score, sanctions_screening_score, jurisdiction_risk_score 0.01–0.10

2.2 Control Risk (CR) — Transaction Context (40 Dimensions)

CR captures what is happening: transaction characteristics, velocity patterns, and technical signals.

CategoryDimensionsKey IndicatorsPerfect Values
Transaction Chars CR[0-9] amount_deviation_score, round_amount_indicator, merchant_category_risk 0.02–0.10
Velocity Patterns CR[10-19] hourly_velocity_score, burst_detection_score, pattern_break_score 0.02–0.10
Geographic/Network CR[20-29] cross_border_indicator, mule_account_indicator, layering_pattern_score 0.01–0.10
Technical Context CR[30-39] vpn_tor_indicator, bot_detection_score, session_hijack_indicator 0.01–0.10

2.3 The Perfect Vector

The Perfect Vector represents an ideal low-risk transaction from a fully verified, long-standing customer with consistent behavior. It serves as the reference point for all similarity calculations.

🎯 Adaptive Learning

Unlike static baselines, TCN's Perfect Vector learns continuously from approved non-fraud transactions. It adapts to population drift using momentum-based updates—see Section 6 for the learning algorithm.

3 Cosine Similarity: Measuring Risk Deviation

Cosine similarity measures the angular distance between two vectors, independent of magnitude. This is crucial because we care about the pattern of risk distribution across dimensions, not absolute values.

cos(θ) = (A · B) / (‖A‖ × ‖B‖)
Dot product divided by the product of Euclidean norms. For 40D vectors: Σ(Aᵢ × Bᵢ) / √Σ(Aᵢ²) × √Σ(Bᵢ²)

3.1 Interpretation

SimilarityAngleMeaningRisk Level
1.0Identical to Perfect VectorLowest
0.85+~32°Very similar to idealLow
0.50–0.8532°–60°Moderate deviationMedium
<0.50>60°Significant deviationHigh
0.090°Orthogonal (perpendicular)Maximum

3.2 Why Cosine Similarity?

Scale Invariant

A high-value transaction isn't penalized for magnitude—only pattern matters

Interpretable

Angular distance has intuitive meaning: "how aligned is this with ideal behavior?"

Efficient

O(n) computation enables <1ms vector comparison at scale

4 Audit Risk (AR) Calculation

The Audit Risk score combines IR and CR similarities into a single risk metric, inspired by traditional audit methodology (AR = IR × CR). We convert similarity (higher = safer) to risk (higher = riskier).

AR = [ 0.4 × (1 - IRsim) + 0.6 × (1 - CRsim) ]0.8
Weighted combination with non-linear scaling to amplify mid-range signals

4.1 Weight Rationale

ComponentWeightRationale
IR Risk = 1 - IR_similarity 40% Entity profile is important but static; fraud can occur from trusted accounts
CR Risk = 1 - CR_similarity 60% Transaction characteristics are more actionable for real-time decisions

4.2 Non-Linear Scaling

The exponent 0.8 applies a power function that amplifies mid-range values, making the system more sensitive to moderate risk signals that might otherwise fall below thresholds.

4.3 Decision Thresholds

AR ScoreDecisionAction
AR < 0.30 ACCEPT Transaction proceeds to clearing
0.30 ≤ AR < 0.70 REVIEW Flagged for manual compliance review
AR ≥ 0.70 BLOCK Transaction rejected, escalated to fraud team

5 3D Visualization

To visualize 80-dimensional data, we project to 3D using domain-aware aggregation. Unlike generic PCA, our projection preserves semantic meaning by grouping related dimensions.

5.1 Axis Mapping

X-Axis: Entity Risk

Account profile + behavioral patterns

X = mean(IR[0:10] + IR[20:30]) × 2 - 1
Y-Axis: Transaction Risk

Amount characteristics + velocity

Y = mean(CR[0:10] + CR[10:20]) × 2 - 1
Z-Axis: Compliance Risk

KYC/PEP status + geographic risk

Z = mean(IR[30:40] + CR[20:30]) × 2 - 1

5.2 Visual Interpretation

CoordinatePositionMeaning
(-1, -1, -1)OriginIdeal low-risk transaction (near Perfect Vector)
(0, 0, 0)CenterModerate risk across all dimensions
(+1, +1, +1)Far cornerMaximum risk on all axes

The visualization displays wireframe spheres centered on the Perfect Vector representing decision zones: green (ACCEPT r=0.4), yellow (REVIEW r=0.8), red (BLOCK r=1.3).

6 Agentic AI: Autonomous Compliance

By 2027, Gartner predicts 50% of enterprises will deploy AI agents for autonomous decision-making. TCN is architected from day one for this agentic future—systems that perceive, reason, decide, and learn without human intervention.

6.1 The Four Pillars of Agentic AI

👁️ PERCEIVE

80D vector ingestion captures complete transaction context

🧠 REASON

Multi-agent ensemble weighs cosine, anomaly, and neural signals

⚡ DECIDE

Autonomous ACCEPT/REVIEW/BLOCK in <50ms

📈 LEARN

Continuous adaptation from every transaction

6.2 Why 80D Fixed Dimensions: A Deliberate Architectural Choice

Our 80D semantic vector space is not a limitation—it's a deliberate design decision that enables autonomous AI at payment speed:

⚡ O(n) Linear Scaling Guarantee

Cosine similarity has O(n) time complexity. For 80 dimensions: ~500 floating-point operations = <1 microsecond per comparison. Competitors using 1000D+ embeddings face O(n²) for similarity computations, requiring 50-200ms. This is why TCN achieves <50ms decisions while they struggle.

ApproachComplexityOps (80D)Latency
TCN Cosine Similarity O(n) ~500 <1μs
Full Outer Product (1600D) O(n²) ~6,400 ~10μs
Neural Network Forward O(n×h) ~10,000+ ~100μs
Black-box 1000D Embeddings O(n²) ~1,000,000 50-200ms

At 10,000 TPS: Vector comparison uses ~5ms total, leaving 995ms for ensemble logic, logging, and I/O. The bottleneck is never the vector math.

6.3 Structured World Model for Agent Reasoning

Unlike opaque embeddings from black-box neural networks, our 80D vectors provide a structured world model that AI agents can navigate and explain:

PropertyCapability
Semantic DimensionsEach dimension has clear meaning—agents reason about WHY a decision was made
Geometric ReasoningDistance/angle computations have intuitive risk interpretations
CompositionalAgents reason about IR vs CR components separately
ComparableAll transactions exist in same coordinate system relative to Perfect Vector
No Dimensionality ReductionFixed dimensions mean no PCA/t-SNE latency or explainability loss

6.4 Multi-Agent Ensemble Architecture

TCN operates as a multi-agent system where specialized agents collaborate—mirroring how DeepMind and OpenAI structure complex decisions:

1. Similarity Agent
Weight: 40%

Compares transaction to Adaptive Perfect Vector via cosine similarity. Detects deviation from normal behavior.

2. Anomaly Agent
Weight: 25%

Mahalanobis + Isolation + LOF ensemble. Catches never-before-seen attack patterns.

3. Neural Agent
Weight: 35%

80→64→32→1 network with online learning. Learns non-linear fraud signatures.

4. Confidence Agent
Meta-Agent

Variance-based agreement. High disagreement → REVIEW. Prevents false confidence.

5. Explainer Agent
Output Layer

Top risk factors with contribution scores. GDPR Art. 22 compliant.

ARensemble = (0.40 × Cosine + 0.25 × Anomaly + 0.35 × Neural)0.8
Adversarial robustness: attacker must fool ALL agents, not just one

6.5 Continuous Learning Without Retraining

⚠ The Problem with Batch ML

Traditional systems require weeks to retrain. Fraud rings exploit the "retraining gap"—they know banks update quarterly. TCN learns continuously.

ComponentLearning SignalSpeed
Adaptive Perfect VectorApproved non-fraud transactionsReal-time (momentum-based EWMA)
Neural NetworkConfirmed fraud labelsHours (mini-batch gradient descent)
Anomaly DetectorPopulation statisticsContinuous (running mean/covariance)
Pnew = Pold + α × velocity
velocity = β × velocityold + (1 - β) × (target - Pold)
α = 0.01, β = 0.9, decay = 0.999^hours — fraud pattern Monday morning → blocked Monday afternoon

6.6 Explainability Output

{
  "top_risk_factors": [
    { "dimension": "CR:mule_account_indicator", "contribution": 0.89 },
    { "dimension": "CR:cross_border_indicator", "contribution": 0.76 },
    { "dimension": "CR:amount_deviation_score", "contribution": 0.71 },
    { "dimension": "IR:pep_status_score", "contribution": 0.65 }
  ]
}

6.7 Regulatory Compliance Built-In

RequirementHow TCN Satisfies It
EU AI ActHigh-risk AI with required risk assessment, logging, human oversight
SR 11-7 (Fed/OCC)Model risk management with documented methodology and validation
GDPR Art. 22Right to explanation via top risk factors for every decision
FATF RecommendationsRisk-based approach with explainable scoring for AML
PCI-DSSReal-time fraud monitoring with complete audit capabilities

6.8 Competitive Advantage

Traditional Fraud SystemsTransaction Compliance Nexus
Static rule enginesSelf-learning Perfect Vector
Human review bottleneck (200-500ms)<50ms autonomous decisions
Black-box ML (unexplainable)80D vectors (fully interpretable)
1000D+ embeddings (O(n²) slow)80D fixed dimensions (O(n) fast)
Weekly/monthly retrainingContinuous online adaptation
Single detection methodMulti-agent ensemble
5-15% false positive rates60%+ reduction via ensemble

6.9 Roadmap

VersionCapabilities
v2.0 (Current)ACCEPT/REVIEW/BLOCK with confidence-calibrated thresholds, multi-agent ensemble
v3.0 (2026)Multi-tier autonomous actions, meta-learning across populations, automatic threshold tuning
v4.0 (2027+)LLM-powered reasoning agents, cross-institution federated learning, network-wide fraud ring detection

✓ Agentic AI Readiness Summary

  • O(n) Linear Scaling: 80D fixed dimensions guarantee <1μs vector comparison
  • Structured Vector Space: Enables geometric reasoning and interpretable decisions
  • Multi-Agent Ensemble: Specialized agents collaborate with confidence-aware routing
  • Continuous Learning: Adapts to fraud evolution without manual retraining
  • Sub-50ms Latency: Real-time autonomous decisions at payment speed
  • Regulatory Compliance: Explainability, auditability, and human oversight built-in

A Appendix: Inherent Risk (IR) Dimensions

IR captures entity-level, historical, and behavioral risk factors. All 40 dimensions with their semantic meaning and ideal "Perfect Vector" values:

A.1 Account Profile (IR 0-9) — Used in X-Axis

IndexDimension NameDescriptionPerfect
0account_age_daysAge of the account (older = lower risk)0.05
1account_verification_levelLevel of account verification completed0.02
2kyc_completeness_scoreHow complete the KYC documentation is0.01
3document_authenticity_scoreConfidence in document authenticity0.02
4identity_match_confidenceConfidence that identity matches records0.01
5address_verification_scoreAddress verification status0.03
6phone_verification_scorePhone number verification status0.02
7email_verification_scoreEmail verification status0.02
8biometric_match_scoreBiometric verification match confidence0.01
9account_status_scoreCurrent account standing (good/bad)0.01

A.2 Transaction History (IR 10-19)

IndexDimension NameDescriptionPerfect
10historical_transaction_countNumber of past transactions (more = more data)0.10
11historical_avg_amountAverage transaction amount historically0.15
12historical_max_amountMaximum transaction amount on record0.20
13historical_decline_ratioRatio of declined transactions0.02
14historical_chargeback_ratioRatio of chargebacks filed0.01
15historical_fraud_flagsNumber of past fraud flags0.01
16payment_consistency_scoreConsistency of payment patterns0.05
17recipient_diversity_scoreDiversity of payment recipients0.10
18channel_consistency_scoreConsistency of channels used0.05
19time_pattern_consistencyConsistency of transaction timing0.05

A.3 Behavioral Profile (IR 20-29) — Used in X-Axis

IndexDimension NameDescriptionPerfect
20login_pattern_scoreConsistency of login patterns0.05
21device_consistency_scoreConsistency of devices used0.03
22ip_consistency_scoreConsistency of IP addresses0.05
23geolocation_consistencyConsistency of geographic locations0.05
24session_behavior_scoreNormal vs anomalous session behavior0.05
25navigation_pattern_scoreExpected navigation patterns0.05
26interaction_velocity_scoreSpeed of user interactions0.10
27feature_usage_patternTypical feature usage patterns0.05
28communication_pattern_scoreCommunication frequency/style0.05
29preference_stability_scoreStability of user preferences0.05

A.4 Risk Classification (IR 30-39) — Used in Z-Axis

IndexDimension NameDescriptionPerfect
30pep_status_scorePolitically Exposed Person status0.01
31sanctions_screening_scoreSanctions list screening result0.01
32adverse_media_scoreNegative media mentions0.01
33industry_risk_scoreRisk level of industry/sector0.10
34occupation_risk_scoreRisk level of occupation0.10
35income_source_riskRisk of income sources0.05
36wealth_source_verificationVerification of wealth source0.05
37relationship_network_riskRisk from associated relationships0.05
38jurisdiction_risk_scoreRisk level of jurisdiction0.05
39overall_risk_categoryAggregate risk classification0.05